# Uzbek government forces killed hundreds of unarmed protesters at Andijan on 13 May 2005 and then imposed a false official account that recast the dead as armed Islamist terrorists

**Verdict: Proven.** The core event is documented beyond serious dispute: on 13 May 2005, Uzbek security forces opened fire on a large crowd of mostly unarmed civilians in Andijan's Bobur Square, killing a very large number of people. Human Rights Watch, working from dozens of firsthand interviews in two field reports (“Bullets Were Falling Like Rain” and “Burying the Truth”), and a UN human-rights mission that gathered testimony from survivors who fled to Kyrgyzstan, concluded that the killing was indiscriminate and disproportionate and that hundreds most likely died. The government of President Islam Karimov put the toll at roughly 187, described nearly all the dead as terrorists, blamed banned Islamist groups, refused an independent international inquiry, and prosecuted the events in closed and stage-managed trials. This file rates as substantiated the two findings the independent record supports: that state forces carried out a mass killing of civilians, and that the official version is a documented cover story. The precise death toll remains contested, with credible estimates ranging from the government's figure to several hundred and, in one defector's account, far higher; that specific number is reported here as unresolved, not as settled.

Category: Government & Intelligence · Era: 2000s · First circulated: The competing accounts formed within days of 13 May 2005: the Uzbek government's terrorist-uprising narrative on state media, and the survivor testimony collected by journalists, Human Rights Watch, and a UN mission to Kyrgyzstan in the weeks that followed. · Believed by: That state forces killed large numbers of unarmed civilians at Andijan is the consensus of Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the European Union, and independent scholars. The Uzbek government has never accepted it, maintaining that the dead were terrorists and that reports of a massacre are Western fabrication.
URL: https://theconspiratory.com/theory/andijan-massacre

## Summary
In the early hours of 13 May 2005, armed men stormed a prison in the eastern Uzbek city of Andijan, freed 23 local businessmen on trial for alleged religious extremism, and seized the regional administration building. By morning, thousands of ordinary residents had gathered in the city's central Bobur Square, most of them unarmed and voicing anger about poverty, repression, and unfair trials. Uzbek security forces sealed the square and opened fire, according to survivors without warning, using armored vehicles and snipers. The government of President Islam Karimov said about 187 people died, called almost all of them terrorists, and blamed banned Islamist organizations. Human Rights Watch field investigations and a UN mission that interviewed survivors reached a very different conclusion: a mass killing of largely unarmed civilians, with a death toll most likely in the hundreds. Uzbekistan refused every call for an independent inquiry. This file treats the massacre as documented and the official account as a proven falsification, while reporting the exact toll as contested.

## The claim
That on 13 May 2005 the Uzbek state, on the authority of President Islam Karimov's government, deliberately fired on a crowd of overwhelmingly peaceful, unarmed protesters in Andijan, killing hundreds; that the authorities then constructed a false official narrative, understating the toll and portraying the dead as armed Islamist militants, in order to escape accountability; and that the government blocked an independent international investigation precisely to keep that cover story intact.

## Origin and timeline
- 2004-06: Twenty-three businessmen in Andijan are arrested and later charged with belonging to Akramia, an alleged offshoot of the banned group Hizb ut-Tahrir, and with anti-constitutional activity. Their trial, seen locally as an attack on respected employers rather than a genuine extremism case, draws sympathetic crowds and becomes a focal point for wider grievances over poverty and repression.
- 2005-02: The trial of the 23 businessmen opens, with the charges carrying long prison terms. Supporters gather outside the courthouse throughout the spring, and frustration builds as the case is widely viewed as unjust.
- 2005-05-13: In the early morning, gunmen attack government buildings, break into the city prison and free hundreds of inmates including the 23 defendants, and occupy the regional administration building, taking hostages. Through the morning, thousands of residents fill Bobur Square in a rare mass protest, most of them unarmed and voicing economic and political grievances.
- 2005-05-13: Uzbek security forces seal off Bobur Square and open fire on the crowd, according to numerous survivors without effective warning, using armored personnel carriers and sniper positions. Witnesses describe sustained, indiscriminate shooting that leaves the square strewn with dead and wounded. Many of those trying to flee are cut down.
- 2005-05-14: The government of President Islam Karimov says roughly 187 people were killed, describes almost all of them as terrorists and members of banned Islamist groups, and blames an armed uprising organized by extremists. State media presents the events as a foiled coup rather than a crackdown on civilians.
- 2005-06: Human Rights Watch publishes “Bullets Were Falling Like Rain,” based on some 50 interviews with survivors and witnesses. It finds that government forces killed hundreds of mostly unarmed people, that the shooting was indiscriminate and disproportionate, and that the scale and nature of the killing amount to a massacre. A UN human-rights mission that interviewed survivors who fled to Kyrgyzstan reaches a similar view, warning the events may constitute a mass killing.
- 2005-07: Uzbekistan orders the United States to vacate the Karshi-Khanabad (K2) air base used for operations in Afghanistan, delivering an eviction notice after Washington joins calls for an independent inquiry. The move is widely read as retaliation for Western criticism of the Andijan killings.
- 2005-09: Human Rights Watch publishes “Burying the Truth,” documenting how the government rewrote the story of Andijan: intimidating witnesses, staging a show trial that scripted defendants into confirming the official narrative, and refusing an independent investigation. Closed and stage-managed trials of alleged organizers follow.
- 2005-11: The European Union imposes sanctions on Uzbekistan over its refusal to allow an independent inquiry: an arms embargo, visa bans on senior officials, and a partial suspension of its cooperation agreement. The measures are eased and then dropped by 2009 as Western governments re-engage, without Uzbekistan ever conceding an independent investigation.

## The evidence, claim by claim
- Claim: Uzbek state forces fired on a large crowd of civilians in Andijan on 13 May 2005.
  Evidence: This is not in genuine dispute; even the government acknowledges its forces opened fire in Bobur Square. What is documented by independent investigators is the character of that fire. Human Rights Watch, drawing on roughly 50 firsthand interviews, and a UN mission that spoke with survivors in Kyrgyzstan both concluded that troops shot into a largely unarmed crowd from armored vehicles and elevated positions, and that the shooting was indiscriminate and disproportionate. The disagreement is not over whether the state killed people, but over how many and who they were.
- Claim: The dead were armed Islamist terrorists staging a violent uprising, as the government says.
  Evidence: The independent record does not support this as a description of the crowd. There was an armed element overnight: gunmen did storm the prison and seize a building. But Human Rights Watch found no evidence that the thousands who gathered in the square shared an Islamist agenda, reporting instead that they spoke of poverty, corruption, unfair trials, and government repression. Investigators concluded that the great majority of those killed were unarmed civilians, including bystanders and people fleeing. The blanket label of “terrorists” is part of the official account this file treats as false, not a finding the evidence sustains.
- Claim: About 187 people died, as the Uzbek government stated.
  Evidence: That figure is the government's own and has never been independently verified; Uzbekistan blocked the outside investigation that could have tested it. Human Rights Watch judged that hundreds most likely died, noting eyewitness accounts of one shooting site where some 300 to 400 people were present and few survived. Contemporary foreign press estimates ran to several hundred, and a defector from the security service later alleged a far higher toll. Because the state controlled the scene, the hospitals, and the burials, the precise number is unrecoverable at present. This file reports the killing of civilians as documented and the exact toll as contested.
- Claim: There was an independent investigation that established what happened.
  Evidence: There was not, and that absence is itself central to the case. Uzbekistan rejected repeated calls from the UN, the EU, and human-rights bodies for an independent international inquiry. The nearest things to authoritative investigations are the Human Rights Watch field reports and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights mission that interviewed survivors in Kyrgyzstan, all conducted outside government control and all pointing to a massacre. The domestic proceedings were closed or stage-managed and produced verdicts that ratified the official story rather than tested it.
- Claim: The government actively constructed and enforced a false version of events.
  Evidence: This is the specific finding of Human Rights Watch's second report, “Burying the Truth.” It documented witness intimidation, pressure on survivors and relatives to stay silent or recant, and a show trial in which defendants delivered confessions that tracked the state's narrative. Independent journalists and rights monitors were expelled or restricted. The pattern, an official toll that cannot be checked, a terrorist framing at odds with survivor accounts, and a refusal of any outside inquiry, is what the substantiated cover-up claim rests on.
- Claim: The international response confirmed that something grave and hidden had occurred.
  Evidence: The reaction is part of the record, though it is not proof by itself. The EU imposed an arms embargo and visa bans explicitly citing Uzbekistan's refusal to permit an independent investigation; the United States, after joining the calls for an inquiry, was expelled from the K2 air base. The UN human-rights office publicly warned the events might amount to a mass killing and pressed for an international commission. States and bodies with no shared agenda converged on the same demand, which is consistent with a serious atrocity the government was working to conceal rather than with a routine counterterrorism operation.
- Claim: The full truth of Andijan is now settled and closed.
  Evidence: It is not. The massacre itself is documented, but two decades on there has still been no independent forensic accounting, no reliable list of the dead, and no acknowledgment from the Uzbek state, whose position remains that the security forces acted against terrorists. Some survivors and relatives are still afraid to speak. What is substantiated is the mass killing of civilians and the falsity of the official account; what remains open is the exact toll and any prospect of formal accountability.

## Why people believe it
- The independent evidence is unusually direct. Unlike theories that must be argued into existence, Andijan rests on dozens of firsthand survivor interviews gathered by Human Rights Watch within weeks, plus a UN mission's testimony, all describing the same thing: troops firing into a trapped crowd. The convergence of independent witnesses gives the massacre account a solid footing.
- The government's own conduct invited disbelief. A state that is confident in its version welcomes scrutiny; Uzbekistan did the opposite, refusing every independent inquiry, expelling monitors, and staging trials that confirmed rather than tested its story. That behavior reads to most observers as concealment, and it drives the conviction that the official toll and framing are false.
- The context fit a pattern. Andijan happened under one of the world's most repressive governments, with a documented record of torture and political imprisonment, in a region where earlier crowds had toppled neighboring leaders. A regime with that history opening fire on a protest, then blaming terrorists, matched what people already knew of how it operated.
- The human detail is hard to dismiss. Accounts of a square strewn with bodies, of people shot as they fled, of families unable to recover or count their dead, carry a specificity that a simple counterterrorism raid does not, and they align across many independent tellings rather than tracing back to a single source.

## Open questions
- The exact death toll is unknown and may never be recovered. Estimates range from the government's roughly 187 to several hundred in the independent investigations, to far higher in one defector's account. Because the state controlled the scene, the morgues, and the burials, and blocked any independent forensic count, the true number remains an honest gap in the record.
- The chain of command and the specific orders are undocumented. It is clear that state forces did the shooting and that this occurred under Karimov's government, but exactly who authorized the manner of the operation, and what instructions the troops received, has never been established by an independent inquiry with access to Uzbek officials and records.
- The overnight armed action remains only partly explained. Who organized the prison break and the seizure of the administration building, what their aims were, and how that group related to the far larger peaceful crowd that gathered later, are questions the government's terrorist narrative answers self-servingly and no neutral investigation has been allowed to resolve.
- Accountability is still absent two decades on. No senior official has faced an independent reckoning, no authoritative list of the dead exists, and the Uzbek state has not acknowledged the killing of civilians. Whether any formal accounting is ever possible, and what it would find, is unresolved.

## Sources
- “Bullets Were Falling Like Rain”: The Andijan Massacre, May 13, 2005, Human Rights Watch (2005): https://www.hrw.org/report/2005/06/06/bullets-were-falling-rain/andijan-massacre-may-13-2005
- Burying the Truth: Uzbekistan Rewrites the Story of the Andijan Massacre, Human Rights Watch (2005): https://www.hrw.org/report/2005/09/18/burying-truth/uzbekistan-rewrites-story-andijan-massacre
- 20 Years Since Andijan, Remembering Past Abuses in Uzbekistan, Human Rights Watch (2025): https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/05/14/20-years-andijan-remembering-past-abuses-uzbekistan
- The Andijan Massacre Remembered, Amnesty International (2015): https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/07/the-andijan-massacre-remembered/
- High Commissioner for Human Rights sends team to Kyrgyzstan to look into May incidents in Andijan, UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2005): https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2009/10/high-commissioner-human-rights-sends-team-kyrgyzstan-look-may-incidents
- Uzbekistan: 10 years after the Andijan massacre, Al Jazeera (2015): https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2015/5/12/uzbekistan-10-years-after-the-andijan-massacre
- Uzbekistan's Deadly Decade, Foreign Policy (2015): https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/05/13/uzbekistans-deadly-decade-andijan-massacre-human-rights-karimov/
- EU Slaps Arms Embargo on Uzbekistan, Arms Control Association (2005): https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2005-11/eu-slaps-arms-embargo-uzbekistan
- Factbox: Andijon Timeline, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (2006): https://www.rferl.org/a/1061536.html
- Andijan massacre, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andijan_massacre

Rated by The Conspiratory, a neutral, sourced encyclopedia of conspiracy theories. Full page: https://theconspiratory.com/theory/andijan-massacre