# South African police shot dead 34 striking miners at Marikana in 2012 under an operational plan the Farlam Commission later found to be defective, amid disputed questions of political pressure behind the crackdown

**Verdict: Proven.** The killing is documented beyond dispute: on 16 August 2012 officers of the South African Police Service opened fire on striking platinum miners at Marikana, killing 34 and wounding roughly 78, the deadliest use of lethal force by the South African state since the end of apartheid. The rated claim is framed through the findings of the official Judicial Commission of Inquiry chaired by retired judge Ian Farlam, whose 2015 report concluded that the police operation was carried out under a plan that was 'defective' and should not have been implemented that day, and that police leadership then sought to conceal how the decision was taken. On that basis the core of this file, a state killing under a defective plan, is substantiated. Two layers stay separate. The Farlam Commission cleared senior politicians, including then deputy president Cyril Ramaphosa, of legal responsibility; whether political pressure (including Lonmin's lobbying) drove the crackdown is a contested question the commission did not resolve against those figures, and this file reports it as an attributed allegation, not fact. As of 2025 no officer has been criminally convicted and the state has issued no unconditional apology.

Category: Government & Intelligence · Era: 2010s · First circulated: Within hours of the 16 August 2012 shooting, which was partly filmed by television crews, as unions, opposition figures, and the press asked who had ordered the operation and why; the official account arrived in the Farlam Commission report submitted in March 2015 and released publicly that June · Believed by: That the police killed 34 miners is universally accepted and was filmed. The Farlam Commission's finding that the police plan was defective is the mainstream, official account. The further claim that the crackdown was driven by political pressure from Lonmin and government figures remains contested, was not upheld against those individuals by the commission, and is reported here as an attributed allegation.
URL: https://theconspiratory.com/theory/marikana-massacre

## Summary
On 16 August 2012, near the Lonmin platinum mine at Marikana in South Africa's North West province, officers of the South African Police Service opened fire on striking rock-drill operators who had gathered on a rocky outcrop during a wildcat strike over wages. Thirty-four miners were shot dead and about seventy-eight were wounded, many hit in the back or as they fled. Ten other people, including two police officers and two mine security guards, had been killed in the violent week before. It was the deadliest act of state violence in post-apartheid South Africa, drawing comparisons to the apartheid-era Sharpeville and Soweto killings. President Jacob Zuma appointed a Judicial Commission of Inquiry under retired judge Ian Farlam. Its 2015 report found the police operational plan defective and criticised police, the mining company Lonmin, and the unions, while clearing senior politicians of legal responsibility. This file separates the documented killing and the commission's defective-plan finding from the still-contested question of who, if anyone, applied political pressure to force the confrontation.

## The claim
That the South African state gunned down 34 striking miners at Marikana in a premeditated show of force, that the police plan was not a botched crowd-control operation but a decision to break the strike by lethal means, and, in the wider political reading, that the crackdown was driven from above by pressure from the mining company Lonmin and by government and ANC figures with a stake in ending a costly, embarrassing strike.

## Origin and timeline
- 2012-08-10: Rock-drill operators at Lonmin's Marikana platinum operation launch a wildcat strike, demanding a monthly wage of R12,500, outside the existing collective-bargaining agreement and without the backing of the dominant National Union of Mineworkers (NUM). Tension between NUM and the rival AMCU union runs through the dispute.
- 2012-08-11: The strike turns violent over several days. In clashes at and around the mine, ten people are killed in the week before 16 August, including two Lonmin security guards and two police officers, alongside several miners and NUM members.
- 2012-08-14: At a meeting with Lonmin executives, North West provincial police commissioner Zukiswa Mbombo is recorded urging that the situation be resolved, in words later scrutinised by the commission. Lonmin management presses for a swift end to a strike that is halting production.
- 2012-08-15: Cyril Ramaphosa, then an ANC national executive member and a director of a company with a substantial stake in Lonmin, sends emails describing the violence as 'dastardly criminal' acts and calling for 'concomitant action.' The emails become central to later allegations of political pressure, which Ramaphosa disputes.
- 2012-08-16: Police move to disperse and disarm the miners gathered on a koppie (a rocky hill). Officers open fire in two locations later labelled Scene 1 and Scene 2: 17 miners are killed at the first, and a further 17 are shot dead, some among rocks and while fleeing, at the second. In total 34 die and about 78 are wounded. Part of the first volley is captured on camera.
- 2012-08-16: In the days after, some 270 arrested miners are charged with the murder of their fellow strikers under the 'common purpose' doctrine, on the theory that the strikers' conduct provoked the police fire. Amid national and international outcry, the National Prosecuting Authority withdraws the charges.
- 2012-08-23: President Jacob Zuma appoints a Judicial Commission of Inquiry, chaired by retired Supreme Court of Appeal judge Ian Farlam, to investigate the conduct of the police, Lonmin, the unions, and the strikers, and the circumstances of the killings.
- 2015-03-31: The Farlam Commission submits its report to President Zuma. It finds the police operation was conducted under a defective plan, that the 'tactical option' should not have been implemented that day, and that senior police leadership subsequently sought to conceal how the decision came about. It criticises Lonmin and the unions, and finds no basis to hold named politicians legally responsible.
- 2015-06-25: The full report is released to the public. It recommends further investigation into whether individual officers should face prosecution and a review of the fitness of national police commissioner Riah Phiyega for office. Survivors and victims' families criticise it for stopping short of assigning individual criminal blame.
- 2022-08-16: On the tenth anniversary, survivors, families, and rights groups note that no police officer has been criminally convicted for the 16 August killings, that civil-damages claims remain unresolved, and that the state has issued no unconditional apology. The National Prosecuting Authority is repeatedly criticised for delay in the years that follow.

## The evidence, claim by claim
- Claim: The police killed 34 striking miners at Marikana on 16 August 2012.
  Evidence: This is settled and was partly filmed. Officers of the South African Police Service opened fire on miners gathered on and around a rocky hill during a wildcat strike, killing 34 and wounding roughly 78. The Farlam Commission, the police, and every serious account treat the death toll as established fact. It is the deadliest use of lethal force by the South African state since the end of apartheid.
- Claim: An official inquiry examined the killings rather than leaving them to rumour.
  Evidence: Correct. President Zuma appointed the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into the events at Marikana, chaired by retired judge Ian Farlam, which sat for more than two years, heard extensive evidence, and delivered a detailed report in 2015. It is that record, not press speculation, that this file treats as the authoritative account of how the operation was planned and conducted.
- Claim: The police operational plan was defective.
  Evidence: This is the commission's finding, stated plainly. Farlam concluded that the plan under which police moved to disperse and disarm the strikers on 16 August was defective, that the 'tactical option' should not have been implemented that day, and that a safer approach, encircling the miners and offering them an exit to surrender weapons, could have been attempted instead. The report also found that police leadership sought to conceal how the fatal decision was taken.
- Claim: The commission proved that political pressure from Lonmin or government leaders ordered the killings.
  Evidence: It did not, and this is the key limit. The Farlam Commission criticised Lonmin for failing to engage with the workers on their wage demands, and it examined the conduct of provincial commissioner Zukiswa Mbombo, of the police minister, and of Cyril Ramaphosa. But it found no basis to hold those politicians legally responsible for the deaths and did not conclude that they ordered or engineered the shooting. The claim that political pressure drove the crackdown is a serious, widely voiced allegation, not a commission finding, and this file reports it as such.
- Claim: Ramaphosa's 'concomitant action' emails show he called for the miners to be shot.
  Evidence: This overstates what the record establishes. On 15 August 2012 Ramaphosa, a Lonmin-linked director, emailed officials describing the violence as 'dastardly criminal' and urging 'concomitant action,' and miners were killed the next day. Critics read the sequence as damning. Ramaphosa testified that he meant appropriate lawful steps to stop ongoing violence, not lethal force, and the commission accepted there was no basis to find him responsible for the deaths. The emails are part of the record and fuel the political-pressure allegation, but they are not proof that he ordered a massacre.
- Claim: The miners were the aggressors, so the police fire was justified self-defence.
  Evidence: The commission's picture is mixed and does not support this as a clean defence. Farlam found that the strikers' conduct in the preceding week was violent and that some among them were armed, and it criticised union and worker conduct. But it also found the plan defective and the manner of the operation unjustified in its execution, with many miners killed at Scene 2 away from the initial confrontation. Both facts hold at once: real prior violence, and a defective, deadly police response that the commission said should not have unfolded as it did.
- Claim: No one has been held criminally accountable for the killings.
  Evidence: Substantially correct as of 2025. The commission recommended further investigation into individual officers and a fitness inquiry into the national police commissioner. But no officer has been criminally convicted for the 16 August shootings, prosecutions have stalled amid sustained criticism of the National Prosecuting Authority, civil-damages claims by survivors and families remain contested, and the state has issued no unconditional apology. The gap between the commission's findings and any criminal accountability is itself part of the story.
- Claim: Marikana was the deadliest state killing in post-apartheid South Africa.
  Evidence: Confirmed, and not seriously contested. The 34 deaths on 16 August 2012 make it the single deadliest act of lethal force by the South African state since the end of apartheid in 1994, and commentators have compared it to the apartheid-era Sharpeville (1960) and Soweto (1976) killings. That significance is independent of the still-open questions about who, above the officers on the ground, bears responsibility.

## Why people believe it
- The core event was filmed. Television crews captured part of the first volley, so the killing of miners by police is not a claim that has to be argued into existence; it is documented footage, which gives every reading of Marikana an unusually solid and disturbing starting point.
- There is an official inquiry to point to. Unlike many state-violence theories, this one can cite a presidentially appointed judicial commission that heard years of evidence and concluded in its own words that the police plan was defective, so critics are anchoring to an official record rather than to speculation.
- The political optics looked damning. A Lonmin-linked ANC heavyweight emailed for 'concomitant action' the day before the shooting, a provincial commissioner spoke of resolving the strike decisively, and the company was pressing to end a costly stoppage, so a narrative of pressure from above felt self-evident to many from the first week.
- The absence of accountability feeds suspicion. More than a decade on, with no officer convicted, no unconditional state apology, and stalled prosecutions, the sense that the powerful were shielded gives the political-pressure reading enduring force, whether or not it can be proven.

## Open questions
- Whether political pressure drove the operation has never been established. The commission examined Lonmin's lobbying and the conduct of senior figures but found no basis to hold named politicians legally responsible; whether pressure nonetheless shaped the police decision to force a confrontation that day remains, in the official record, formally unanswered.
- Why the second killing zone, Scene 2, unfolded as it did is still contested. A large share of the deaths occurred there, some among rocks and away from the initial confrontation, and how a defective dispersal plan became a pursuit that left 17 more men dead has not been resolved into individual criminal findings.
- Who, if anyone, will ever be prosecuted is unclear. The commission recommended further investigation of individual officers, but no criminal conviction has followed, prosecutions have stalled for years, and the practical prospect of accountability for the 16 August killings remains uncertain.
- What the victims are owed is unsettled. Survivors and families have pressed for an unconditional apology and for reparations and damages; those claims remain contested and, in important respects, unresolved more than a decade after the killings.

## Sources
- Flawed police plan blamed for Marikana massacre, Al Jazeera (2015): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/6/26/flawed-police-plan-blamed-for-marikana-massacre
- Marikana report: Key findings and recommendations, Daily Maverick (2015): https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2015-06-26-marikana-report-key-findings-and-recommendations/
- Marikana Commission Report only partly addresses accountability, leaving families with a long struggle for closure, Amnesty International (2015): https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/afr53/2111/2015/en/
- Six years on, still no justice or closure for Marikana victims, Al Jazeera (2018): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/8/15/six-years-on-still-no-justice-or-closure-for-marikana-victims
- Marikana: a massacre still without any criminal consequences, Daily Maverick (2022): https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2022-05-19-marikana-a-massacre-still-without-any-criminal-consequences/
- Marikana victims rally in South Africa as Ramaphosa sued, Al Jazeera (2022): https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/6/2/eff-rallies-with-marikana-victims-in-action-against-ramaphosa
- Marikana: it's time Ramaphosa moved on accountability and reparations, The Conversation (2018): https://theconversation.com/marikana-its-time-ramaphosa-moved-on-accountability-and-reparations-101479
- Summary of the key findings and recommendations made by the Farlam Commission, Marikana Justice / Farlam Commission (report summary) (2015): http://www.marikanajustice.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Summary-of-the-Farlam-Commission-Report.pdf
- Marikana massacre, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marikana_massacre
- Marikana Massacre, 16 August 2012, South African History Online: https://sahistory.org.za/article/marikana-massacre-16-august-2012

Rated by The Conspiratory, a neutral, sourced encyclopedia of conspiracy theories. Full page: https://theconspiratory.com/theory/marikana-massacre