The Conspiratory
Case File No. 7252-E● Open File · Unresolved

The crew of the High Aim 6 vanished from a well-stocked fishing boat found drifting off Western Australia

Where the evidence lands: Unresolved
That the roughly ten Indonesian and Taiwanese men aboard the High Aim 6 disappeared under sinister and unexplained circumstances — variously blamed on mutiny, piracy, or an inexplicable mass vanishing — leaving behind a fully provisioned, undamaged vessel with no sign of a struggle and no bodies ever recovered.
First circulated
2003
Era
2000s
Sources
6

Believed by: Frequently cited as a modern real-life 'ghost ship' mystery

The full story

A boat with no one aboard

In the first week of January 2003, aircraft and vessels operating off the remote north-west coast of Western Australia came upon a fishing boat that should have had a crew and did not. The High Aim 6, a Taiwanese-owned tuna longliner around 20 metres long, was drifting in calm water roughly 80 nautical miles east of Rowley Shoals — about 320 kilometres offshore — well inside Australia's Exclusive Economic Zone. She had left the southern Taiwanese port of Liuchiu on 31 October 2002 with something like ten men aboard, a mix of Taiwanese officers and Indonesian deckhands. When she was found, more than two months later, every one of them was gone.

What unsettled the people who boarded her was not wreckage but its absence. There was fuel in the tanks and food and water in the galley. The crew's clothes and personal effects were still where they had been left. In the hold sat roughly three tonnes of tuna and mackerel, which by the time the boat was examined had reportedly been rotting for up to two weeks, filling the vessel with a nauseating stench. There were no obvious signs of a struggle, no distress call had been logged, and there was no indication that a lifeboat had been launched in an emergency. The boat was towed to Broome, where Australian Federal Police, Customs and other authorities went over her, and an extensive sea search covering thousands of nautical miles was mounted. It found nothing of the crew.

The comparison to the Mary Celestewrote itself, and the story travelled the world as a modern real-life ghost ship. But unlike the 1872 case, this one unfolded in an age of mobile phones and cross-border policing — and that turned out to matter a great deal.

The case for it

The case for something sinister

Strip away the ghost-ship romance and the hard facts still sit uneasily. Ten men do not simply evaporate from a sound, fully provisioned boat in the middle of the Indian Ocean. Two of them — the captain, Chen Tai-cheng, and the engineer, Lin Chung-li— were never seen again, and a crew member would later tell police they had been killed aboard, on or about 8 December 2002, weeks before the boat was found. If that account is even partly true, then the High Aim 6 was not the scene of a natural tragedy but of a killing at sea, and the tidy, undisturbed cabins investigators walked through were the aftermath of violence, not of misfortune.

The detail that pushed Taiwanese police toward that reading was mundane and chilling at once. According to Taiwan's Central News Agency, calls were still being made from Indonesia using the missing engineer's mobile phone as late as 15 January 2003 — a week after the empty boat had already been found drifting off Australia. Someone, in other words, had left the vessel with the dead man's phone and carried it home. After examining the call records, investigators came to regard a mutiny as probable: not an outside force that boarded and vanished, but the crew themselves turning on their officers and then making their way back to shore, leaving the boat and its evidence to drift.

Even the confession that followed did little to settle the unease, because of how much it left out. When Indonesian police, working with their Taiwanese counterparts, tracked down a crew member in the province of North Sulawesi, he admitted the captain and engineer had been killed and that the men had gone home — but he gave no clear motive, no account of where the deaths occurred, no explanation of what became of the bodies, and no description of how a boat hundreds of kilometres out was left behind while its crew reached Indonesia safely. A confession that answers “were they killed?” with “yes” and every other question with silence is, for many, more disturbing than no confession at all.

What the evidence shows

What the record actually shows

For all its eeriness, the High Aim 6 is one of the better-explained “ghost ship” cases, precisely because it happened recently enough to leave a trail. The undisturbed state of the boat, so often presented as proof of the inexplicable, is nothing of the kind. A vessel is left orderly when the people aboard depart on their own terms rather than fighting a fire or a flood; fuel, food and belongings remaining in place is what one would expect if the crew simply left, not evidence that they were spirited away. The three tonnes of spoiling fish tell the same story: the catch had reportedly been decomposing for up to two weeks, which fits an event in early December and a discovery in early January — an interval of weeks in which no one was aboard to preserve it, not a scene frozen at the instant of some sudden vanishing.

The phone records point in a specific and thoroughly earthly direction. Calls placed from the missing engineer's handset inside Indonesia, after the boat was already adrift off Australia, indicate that the crew had returned home and had taken the phone with them. That is the opposite of what a piracy theory predicts. Pirates take fuel, catch, electronics or the boat itself; here all of it was left behind and the vessel merely set loose. The picture that the located crew member's own statement paints — officers killed, crew departing for Indonesia — is one of an internal mutiny, an all-too-human crime among the people aboard, rather than an outside attack or anything paranormal.

It is worth being precise about what the surviving account claims and what it does not. A crew member acknowledged to police that the captain and engineer had been killed and that the men had gone home; that is the substance of the confession as reported. He did not lay out a motive, and the wider details never became public in a verified form. So the honest summary is not that the case was solved and dramatised into a mystery, but that authorities established the broad shape of what happened — a killing aboard, followed by the crew's return to Indonesia — while the specifics that would make it a closed criminal matter were never nailed down. The boat itself, declared abandoned and handed to the Australian Fisheries Management Authority, sat at Broome for a time before being broken up in October 2004 and carted to a landfill: an unglamorous end for a vessel the internet still files under the supernatural.

Why people believe

Why the ghost ship endures

The High Aim 6 endures as a “mystery no one can solve” less because the evidence demands it than because the image is irresistible. A modern steel fishing boat, radios and electronics intact, meals and clothes in place, a hold heavy with catch, and not one living soul aboard — it is the Mary Celeste reborn with a diesel engine, and it slots perfectly into a genre of ghost-ship stories that readers already love. The partial confession only feeds that appetite, because a killing with no stated motive and no recovered bodies leaves exactly the kind of gap the mind rushes to fill.

The jurisdictional tangle helped the legend as much as anything. The vessel was owned and flagged in Taiwan, crewed largely by Indonesians, and found in Australian waters, so the inquiry was divided among agencies in three countries and never produced a single authoritative, public narrative. Where officialdom is quiet and fragmented, retellings multiply, and each one is free to lean a little harder on the uncanny. That most of the crew were never publicly located or prosecuted did the rest: an unfinished story, unlike a courtroom verdict, never stops inviting new theories.

Where the evidence lands

The fair verdict is Unproven— but it is important to be clear about which part is unproven. The paranormal and piracy readings do not fit the evidence: the phone traced to Indonesia, the crew member's own admission that the officers were killed, and the untouched fuel and belongings all point toward a human event among the people aboard, most plausibly a mutiny, rather than an outside force or an inexplicable mass vanishing. On the basic question of whether something otherworldly happened, the answer is almost certainly no.

What remains genuinely open is the crime itself. No motive was ever established, the fate of Chen Tai-cheng and Lin Chung-li's bodies was never resolved, the means by which the crew left a boat far out at sea and reached home was never explained, and most of the men were never held to account in any public record. Those are real gaps, not manufactured ones. The High Aim 6 is best understood not as an unsolvable enigma but as a case that was substantially, and only substantially, explained: the shape of what happened is known, while the details that would close it for good were never pinned down.

Open questions

What's still unexplained

  • No motive for the killing of the captain and engineer was ever established. A crew member acknowledged the deaths but offered no coherent reason, and none has since been documented.
  • The fate of the two officers' bodies, and the precise circumstances of their deaths, were never resolved. No remains were recovered and no detailed, verified account of what happened aboard has emerged.
  • How the crew left a boat that was still hundreds of kilometres out in the Indian Ocean and made their way back to Indonesia — by what vessel, and whether anyone assisted them — has never been publicly explained.
  • Most of the roughly ten men aboard were never located, questioned, or prosecuted in any account that reached the public, leaving the disappearance without full accountability.

Point by point

The claim: The High Aim 6 was a perfectly intact ghost ship, abandoned for no discernible reason, its crew gone in a way nothing ordinary can account for.

What the record shows: The physical state of the boat is well documented — ample fuel, food and water, personal effects left in place, a hold full of decomposing fish, and no evident damage or signs of a struggle. But that undisturbed state is not itself evidence of anything supernatural. A crew member later told investigators that the captain and engineer had been killed and the men had gone home, which describes a human event that leaves a boat physically intact. Vessels are routinely left orderly when the people aboard depart deliberately rather than in a disaster.

The claim: The disappearance was never explained and remains a total, unsolvable mystery.

What the record shows: It is unsolved in important respects, but it was not a blank. Investigators traced calls made from the engineer's phone back to Indonesia after the boat was found, and Indonesian police, working with Taiwan, located at least one crew member in North Sulawesi who admitted the captain and engineer had been killed on 8 December 2002. From that, Taiwanese police concluded a mutiny was probable. What remains genuinely unresolved is the motive, the fate of the bodies, and the full accounting of the crew — not the basic question of whether people simply vanished into thin air.

The claim: Pirates seized the boat and took or killed the crew, as with other vessels attacked in South-East Asian waters.

What the record shows: The recovered evidence fits poorly with piracy. Pirates take valuables, fuel, catch, or the vessel itself; here the fuel, the three-tonne catch, the electronics and the crew's own belongings were left behind, and the boat itself was simply set adrift. Above all, the phone records indicated the crew themselves had returned to Indonesia, and a crew member's own account described an internal killing rather than an outside attack. That points investigators toward events among the people aboard, not toward external raiders.

The claim: The rotting catch and a boat found drifting under power prove the crew vanished suddenly, mid-work, in an instant.

What the record shows: The fish had reportedly been decomposing for up to two weeks by the time the boat was examined, which lines up with the 8 December date the crew member gave and with a discovery on 8 January — an interval of weeks, not the frozen-in-an-instant scene of legend. A longliner left idling or drifting under its own power after its crew has gone is unremarkable, and a hold of unpreserved fish left to spoil is exactly what one would expect if the men who worked the vessel had already left it well before it was found.

Timeline

  1. 2002-10-31The High Aim 6, a Taiwanese-owned tuna longliner, departs the port of Liuchiu (Xiaoliuqiu) in southern Taiwan with a crew of about ten, made up of Taiwanese officers and Indonesian deckhands, for a fishing voyage in the Indian Ocean.
  2. 2002-12-08This is the date a crew member would later give police as the day the captain, Chen Tai-cheng, and the engineer, Lin Chung-li, were killed aboard the vessel — weeks before the boat was found.
  3. 2003-01-08The High Aim 6 is spotted drifting in calm water roughly 80 nautical miles (about 150 km) east of Rowley Shoals, some 320 km off the north-west coast of Western Australia, inside the Australian Exclusive Economic Zone. No one is aboard.
  4. 2003-01-15According to Taiwan's Central News Agency, local calls are still being made from Indonesia using the missing engineer's mobile phone a week after the boat is found. After examining the call records, Taiwanese police come to regard a mutiny as probable.
  5. 2003-01The vessel is towed to Broome, where Australian Federal Police, Customs and other authorities examine it. Investigators find fuel, food, water and the crew's personal belongings still aboard, three tonnes of tuna and mackerel rotting in the hold, and no sign of a struggle; an extensive sea search covering thousands of nautical miles turns up no trace of the crew.
  6. 2003Working with Taiwanese authorities, Indonesian police track down one of the Indonesian crew in the province of North Sulawesi. He admits the captain and engineer were killed and that the crew then made their way home, but gives no clear account of the motive or of how the men left the boat and returned to Indonesia.
  7. 2004-10After being declared abandoned and handed to the Australian Fisheries Management Authority, the derelict vessel — which had sat at Broome and drawn sightseers — is broken up by heavy machinery and trucked to a local landfill, its disappearance still never fully explained.
Where the evidence lands

Unresolved. A crew member later told police the captain and engineer had been killed and the men returned to Indonesia, which points to a mutiny rather than anything supernatural — but no motive was ever established, no bodies were recovered, and most of the crew were never accounted for, so the case is not truly closed.

Sources

  1. 1.High Aim 6Wikipedia
  2. 2.Abandoned ship presents mystery no one can solveTaipei Times (2003)
  3. 3.High Aim 6Futility Closet (2006)
  4. 4.10 Mysterious Ghost Ships That No One Can ExplainReader's Digest
  5. 5.The 15 Creepiest Ghost Ships Ever Found On The High SeasAll That's Interesting
  6. 6.High Aim 6 (firsthand account by an Australian Federal Police officer involved in the Broome examination)Graham's Blog

Help us investigate

This is a living case file. If you spot an error or know evidence we missed, tell us — and weigh in on where you land.

Where do you land?

Cast your read on this one.

What did we miss?

Spotted an error or know a source worth chasing? Every note is read by a human.

Related case files

Written by The Conspiratory Editors · Published July 12, 2026. The Conspiratory lays out the claim, the case on every side, and the sources — so you can weigh it yourself. Spotted a stronger source? Corrections are welcome.