The 2026 government UAP disclosure is a managed release designed to conceal proof of non-human craft
By Colin PetersonJuly 12, 2026
Where the evidence lands →
That the US government has physical proof of non-human or extraterrestrial craft, including recovered vehicles and secret crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering programs, and that the 2026 disclosure wave is a controlled, partial release engineered to look like transparency while the actual evidence continues to be concealed from the public and from most of Congress.
The disclosure is real: the Department of War is releasing historical UAP files through the PURSUE portal, AARO exists and reports that a large share of its cases stay unresolved, and whistleblowers have testified to Congress about a crash-retrieval program. But the claim we rate, that non-human craft are confirmed and being hidden, is not established. AARO's own 2024 Historical Record Report found no verifiable evidence of extraterrestrial technology or any reverse-engineering program, and unexplained is not the same as extraterrestrial. No verifiable physical proof of a non-human craft has been produced.
Believed by: Belief that the government is hiding knowledge of extraterrestrial contact is durable and mainstream: multiple national polls over the past decade have found that roughly two-thirds of US adults think the government knows more about UAP than it has disclosed, and a substantial minority believe some sightings are alien craft.
The thread this file has been following since Rep. Anna Paulina Luna's task force requested them appears to be moving: a tranche of up to 46 UAP videos held by AARO is now reported to be due for imminent release under the Department of War's PURSUE initiative, the same mechanism that produced the 8 May and 22 May tranches. That is a reported expectation rather than a published release, and this entry logs it as such. If the videos appear, the useful question will not be what they show, since the earlier tranches were widely described as underwhelming, but whether the count matches the 46 that whistleblowers said existed. A discrepancy there would bear on the withholding claim in a way the footage itself probably will not. source →
On or around July 22, 2026, the White House directed the Department of War and the intelligence community to waive the nondisclosure agreements signed by former government employees and contractors who worked on UAP matters, so they can come forward to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). A senior administration official stressed that this is not a declassification directive and only lets witnesses speak through official government channels. Reporting (Fox News, which first reported it, with wire syndication carried by Yahoo and others) frames it as a step to surface reluctant witnesses, not as confirmation of recovered non-human craft, and this file's rating is unchanged. source →
A viral rumor promoted in early July 2026 by British filmmaker Mark Christopher Lee, who cited unnamed Washington contacts and remarks attributed to aerospace entrepreneur Robert Bigelow, claimed President Trump had a "soft disclosure" speech "written and ready" for around 8 July 2026 (tied to a NATO summit and the 79th anniversary of Roswell) that would confirm recovered non-human craft and beings. White House officials said no such speech was planned, and the date passed with no such address, so the claimed speech remains unverified and did not materialize. This is distinct from the documented records effort: the White House has publicly stated that Trump is directing the Secretary of War and other agencies to identify and release government files on UAP and alleged extraterrestrial life, and the Department of War is publishing them through the PURSUE portal at war.gov/UFO. A records-release process is not the same as proof of non-human craft, and this file's rating is unchanged. source →
What actually went viral was not the Pentagon footage but a doctored version of it. An X user ran the released clip (designated DOW-UAP-PR030) through an AI upscaler, and the enhanced version appeared to show the object shape-shifting and making a sharp, high-speed maneuver before accelerating away, behavior absent from the original. The altered video spread far faster than the real one and drove a fresh wave of "non-human craft" speculation. It is a clean example of the pattern this file describes: the record is mundane, and the sensational version is a synthetic overlay added after the fact. source →
The Pentagon released its fourth batch of UAP files on July 10, 2026: roughly 19 videos, 14 documents, three images and four audio files. The standout clip, quickly nicknamed the "floating brain" or "jellyfish," comes from a 2020 encounter over the Atlantic and shows a dark, maroonish object, described as 12 to 15 feet tall, that resembles a deformed balloon or cluster of balloons. Per the released assessment, observers said it did not maneuver or change direction and drifted with the wind, which is consistent with the prosaic balloon explanation rather than exotic propulsion. The release itself is a genuine transparency step; the object in it is unremarkable in its actual behavior. source →
The full story
What is actually being released
Something genuinely new happened in the spring of 2026. For the first time, the US government began publishing a large body of its historical UAP records to the open web, for anyone to read without a login or a clearance. The vehicle was a dedicated portal at war.gov/UFO, formally the Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters, or PURSUE. The first release, on 8 May 2026, put out 162 files covering more than 400 incidents dating back to 1947; further tranches followed through the spring, adding video and, for the first time, audio.
This did not come from nowhere. It sits on top of a decade of official steps that each, on its own, was real. The Pentagon confirmed in 2017 that it had run a study program called AATIP and released Navy videos of unexplained objects. In 2021 the Office of the Director of National Intelligence published a preliminary assessment that examined 144 reports and could explain only one. In 2022 the Defense Department stood up a permanent office, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), to collect and analyze the reports. And every year since, Congress has written UAP disclosure mandates into the annual defense authorization bill, including the Fiscal Year 2026 version passed in December 2025.
So the documented picture is not in dispute, and it is worth stating plainly before weighing what it means. The government really did keep UAP material classified for decades. It really did build an office to study it. A real and substantial share of its cases really are unresolved. And it really is now releasing files by the hundred. The question this file turns on is narrower and harder: does any of that amount to proof of non-human craft being concealed?
Why serious people read this as a cover-up
The suspicious reading does not require inventing anything. It is built from the government's own admissions, and that is what gives it force.
Start with the unresolved cases. When a national intelligence assessment looks at 144 incidents and can explain exactly one, and when the office that inherited the mission keeps reporting that most of its holdings stay unexplained, it is not paranoid to ask what is in the other cases. These are not tabloid sightings; they are reports from military pilots and sensor operators, sometimes with radar and infrared and eyewitness accounts agreeing. Objects that appear to move in ways the observers could not match to known aircraft, logged by professionals, and then filed as unresolved.
Then there is the sworn testimony. In July 2023, David Grusch, a decorated former intelligence officer, sat before a House subcommittee and stated under oath that he had been informed of a decades-long program to retrieve and reverse-engineer craft of non-human origin, and that the government possessed both vehicles and biological material. He said he was speaking from the accounts of some 40 witnesses he had interviewed in his official capacity, and he offered to give more in a classified setting. A credentialed insider does not usually risk a perjury charge to say such a thing.
When the government's own office says most of its UAP cases are unresolved, it is not paranoid to ask what is in them.
Finally, watch how the disclosure behaves. It arrives in fragments, tranche by tranche, with redactions. When the House Oversight task force under Rep. Anna Paulina Luna asked in 2026 for 46 specific videos that whistleblowers said AARO held, the department let the deadline pass. To a public that remembers Project Blue Book quietly debunking cases to dampen interest, a staged, deadline-missing, partly redacted release does not read like transparency. It reads like a hand deciding, piece by piece, exactly how much the rest of us get to see.
What the released record actually shows
Here is the difficulty for the cover-up reading: the single most relevant document the government has released is the one that most directly contradicts it, and it was written by the very office at the center of the story.
In March 2024, AARO published Volume 1 of its Report on the Historical Record of US Government Involvement with UAP. It is not a press release; it is a book-length review of official UAP efforts from 1945 to 2023, built on archives and interviews, including with people who claimed direct knowledge of secret programs. Its central findings are blunt. It found no verifiable evidence that any UAP sighting represented extraterrestrial technology. It found no evidence that the US government or private industry ever recovered, or reverse-engineered, off-world craft. And it traced several of the most persistent insider claims to misidentified authentic programs, ordinary classified technology, and the way secrecy itself breeds rumor.
The unresolved cases, meanwhile, do not mean what the shorthand suggests. AARO is explicit that the majority of its holdings are unresolved for a mundane reason: not enough data. A brief infrared clip with no range information, no corroborating radar, and no second sensor cannot be positively identified. It also cannot be called a spacecraft. It can only be called unresolved, which is a statement about the poverty of the evidence, not a verdict on the object. Where AARO does have enough data, the pattern is consistent: cases resolve to balloons, drones, birds, satellites, and aircraft. In its Fiscal Year 2024 report, of hundreds of cases, the ones it could analyze came back prosaic.
Unresolved is a statement about missing data, not a finding of non-human origin.
And the whistleblower testimony, for all its weight, is secondhand. Grusch was careful to say he had not himself seen a craft or a body; he was reporting what others told him. That is a reason to investigate, and AARO did investigate, and it did not find a verifiable program behind the accounts. Sincere testimony about what colleagues described is a lead. It is not a recovered vehicle, and after years of intense congressional and public pressure, no verifiable physical proof of a non-human craft has been placed on the record.
Why this belief endures and grows
Belief that the government is hiding knowledge of alien contact is not a fringe position. Poll after poll finds that around two-thirds of Americans think the government knows more about UAP than it says, and a large minority believe some sightings are craft from elsewhere. This is one of the most widely held unproven beliefs in the country, and 2026 has poured fuel on it.
It endures partly because its foundation is solid. Most conspiracy theories ask you to disbelieve the official account of something that did happen. This one starts from things the government admits: the secret study, the permanent office, the unexplained backlog, the mass release. When the conceded baseline is that rich, the extra step to “and they are hiding the craft” feels less like a leap than a natural extension.
It also offers what the true answer withholds, which is resolution. The documented story is unsatisfying by design: a pile of ambiguous sensor returns, most of them unresolvable for lack of data, tended by a bureaucracy issuing measured reports. The cover-up story, by contrast, has shape. It has recovered vehicles, hidden programs, and insiders who know. It converts a diffuse mystery that may never resolve into a narrative with secrets and stakes, and that is far more compelling than “we do not have enough data.”
The way the disclosure has been run does the rest. A staged release invites the question of what is in the next tranche. A missed deadline for 46 videos invites the question of what is on them. A redaction invites the question of what is under the black bar. Every act of partial transparency, however well intentioned, can be read as confirmation that the real material is still being kept back, which is exactly how a genuine release and a genuine cover-up would look from the outside.
Disclosure, not confirmation
The careful verdict holds two things at once. The disclosure is real and the concealment of non-human craft is unproven, and those are not in tension. Keeping them apart is the whole discipline of the case.
What is established: the government ran secret UAP study programs, built AARO, reports a large backlog of unresolved cases, faces sworn whistleblower testimony about a crash-retrieval program, and is now releasing files at unprecedented scale through PURSUE. What is not established, on the current record, is that any of it constitutes proof of recovered non-human vehicles. AARO's own historical review found no verifiable evidence of extraterrestrial technology and no reverse-engineering program. The unresolved cases are unresolved chiefly for lack of data. The strongest insider testimony is secondhand and uncorroborated by any physical object.
That leaves genuine open questions, and this file does not pretend otherwise: a residue of cases the government itself calls anomalous, a release that is still incomplete, and a history of reluctance that caution alone does not fully explain. Anomalies are not nothing, and they are a reason to keep collecting better data and keep pressing for the rest of the files. But an unexplained sensor return is not an extraterrestrial craft, and a withheld video is not proof of a hidden vehicle. Until verifiable physical evidence of non-human technology actually surfaces, the honest label for the central claim is unproven, sitting on top of a real and consequential story about secrecy, oversight, and the gap between what a government knows and what it will say.
Watch
What's still unexplained
- Why do so many cases stay unresolved, and could better sensors change the ratio? AARO attributes the backlog to insufficient data rather than exotic origin, but the office itself flags a small number of cases as genuinely anomalous and meriting further study. Whether improved, purpose-built collection would resolve those to prosaic causes or sharpen a real anomaly is not yet answered.
- What is actually in the files not yet released? The PURSUE effort is ongoing and staged, and specific records (including the videos requested by the House task force) had not been produced as of this writing. Until the release is complete, the claim that nothing exotic is being withheld rests on trust in the process rather than on the full record.
- How should sworn but secondhand whistleblower testimony be weighed? Grusch and others have made specific, serious claims to Congress based on what they say colleagues told them. The accounts have not been corroborated by physical evidence, and AARO found no verifiable program, yet the witnesses have not recanted. Reconciling credible-sounding testimony with the absence of proof is a genuine, unresolved tension.
- Why has disclosure been so grudging if there is nothing to hide? Even accepting the prosaic explanation, the decades of over-classification, the missed deadlines, and the fights over access are real, and they are not fully explained by national-security caution alone. The pattern of reluctance is itself a fact the innocent account has to account for.
Point by point
The claim: The archive is a controlled release, which shows the real material is being held back.
What the record shows: There is a genuine oddity in the release worth putting on the record, and it is not the one the claim reaches for. The War Zone, reviewing the PURSUE archive on the day it opened, reported that some of the records, including material from the FBI and NASA, had already been released at least in part in the past. Re-publishing documents that were already public is a real observation about the nature of the release, and it is the strongest concrete argument the sceptical reading has. What it does not establish is a withheld cache of extraordinary evidence. An archive that pads its opening tranche with previously available files is equally consistent with a bureaucracy assembling whatever it can clear quickly under a presidential deadline. Thin is not the same as suppressed, and the second requires evidence the first does not supply.
The claim: The 2026 disclosure wave came from mounting pressure that the government could no longer resist.
What the record shows: The documented sequence is simpler and more top-down than that. In February 2026 the president announced on Truth Social that he would direct the Secretary of War and other agencies to begin identifying and releasing government files on alien and extraterrestrial life, UAP and UFOs. PURSUE followed from that directive, opening on 8 May. Asked about it, the White House told The War Zone that the president had ordered the release because he is 'the most transparent president in history', and that 'while past administrations have sought to discredit or dissuade the American people, the President is focused on providing maximum disclosure'. That framing is a political claim rather than a finding, and this file records it as one. The point for the rating is narrower: the release is traceable to an executive decision with an attached transparency message, which is a different thing from a dam breaking under pressure, and it means the contents were selected by the same institutions the theory says are concealing them.
The claim: The government built AARO and is now releasing a mass of UAP files, which proves it had a body of secret UAP evidence all along.
What the record shows: The first half is documented, the inference is not. AARO is real, the PURSUE portal is real, and the 2026 releases are real: hundreds of files covering decades of incidents. But a declassification program is what transparency looks like, not by itself proof of what the files contain. Congress mandated much of this disclosure through successive defense bills, and the records released so far are historical reports, videos, and investigative files, not a recovered craft. That the state kept UAP material classified for decades is beyond dispute; that the material amounts to proof of non-human vehicles does not follow from the act of releasing it.
The claim: A large share of official UAP cases remain unresolved, so a large share must be genuinely unexplainable and therefore likely non-human.
What the record shows: The premise is true and the leap is the error. AARO's own reporting says most of its case holdings stay unresolved, and the 2021 ODNI assessment resolved only 1 of 144 cases. But AARO is explicit about why: the majority are unresolved for lack of data, not because analysis pointed to something exotic. A blurry sensor return with no corroborating information cannot be identified, and cannot be called extraterrestrial either. Unresolved is a statement about missing information, not a finding of non-human origin. Of the cases with enough data to analyze, the office keeps resolving them to balloons, drones, birds, and aircraft.
The claim: A whistleblower testified under oath to Congress that the US recovered non-human craft and runs a reverse-engineering program.
What the record shows: David Grusch did testify to that effect in July 2023, and his willingness to do so under oath is real and significant. But he was candid that he had not personally seen any craft or non-human bodies; he was relaying what he said some 40 witnesses told him during his official work. That is secondhand testimony, not physical evidence. AARO, tasked by Congress to run down exactly these claims, examined the crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering allegations in its 2024 Historical Record Report and found no verifiable evidence that any such program existed. A sworn account of what others described is a serious lead; it is not the same as a recovered vehicle.
The claim: The government keeps missing deadlines and withholding specific videos, which shows it is still hiding the real evidence.
What the record shows: The withholding is documented; its meaning is not. In 2026 Rep. Anna Paulina Luna's task force requested 46 UAP videos that whistleblowers said AARO possessed, and the department missed her deadline to produce them. That friction is real and fairly raises oversight concerns. But records can be withheld for prosaic reasons (classification review, sensor-capability protection, or ordinary bureaucratic delay) and a withheld video of an unidentified object is still a video of an unidentified object. The gap between requested and released fuels suspicion, yet it establishes concealment of records, not concealment of alien craft.
Other readings
Angles that don't fit neatly into the claim or its rebuttal, laid out and weighed, not endorsed.
The 'demons, not aliens' reading
A notable minority interpretation holds that unexplained aerial phenomena are not extraterrestrial craft at all but spiritual or demonic entities, a framing with a long history in some religious traditions that resurfaced prominently in 2026 when Vice President JD Vance entertained it on The Joe Rogan Experience (July 15), saying he leans toward thinking any such beings would be 'demons' rather than aliens while also conceding a benevolent version would look more like 'angels.' It is worth reporting because of who is voicing it, not because it is testable: it is a theological reading, not an evidence claim, and it sits outside what this file rates. If anything it cuts against the exotic-craft narrative, since it too concludes that the 'nuts and bolts alien spaceship' account is not the right explanation. We note it as a culturally significant alternative reading and take no position on it; the record here remains one of mostly prosaic objects and incomplete disclosure, not confirmed non-human intelligence of any kind.
Timeline
- 1952–1969The US Air Force runs Project Blue Book, cataloguing more than 12,000 UFO sightings. It closes in 1969 having found no case that was an extraterrestrial vehicle and no evidence of a technology beyond the era's science, though a residue of cases is left formally unidentified.
- 2017-12-16The New York Times reveals the existence of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), a Pentagon effort to study UAP, and publishes Navy cockpit videos of unexplained objects. UAP re-enters mainstream news after decades on the fringe.
- 2021-06-25The Office of the Director of National Intelligence releases a preliminary assessment of 144 UAP reports. It explains only one, leaving 143 unresolved for lack of data, and explicitly declines to conclude that any were extraterrestrial.
- 2022-07The Department of Defense establishes the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to centralize UAP reporting and analysis across the military and intelligence community, giving the effort a permanent home for the first time.
- 2023-07-26Former intelligence officer David Grusch tells a House Oversight subcommittee, under oath, that he was informed of a multi-decade UAP crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering program and that the government holds non-human craft and biological material. He states he has not personally seen any craft or bodies and is relaying accounts of witnesses he interviewed.
- 2024-03-08AARO publishes Volume 1 of its Report on the Historical Record of US Government Involvement with UAP. Reviewing efforts from 1945 to 2023, it finds no verifiable evidence that any sighting was extraterrestrial technology and no evidence that the government recovered or reverse-engineered off-world craft.
- 2024-11-14AARO's Fiscal Year 2024 consolidated annual report to Congress logs 757 new UAP reports. It closes cases as prosaic objects (balloons, birds, drones, satellites) where data allows, but reports that the majority of its holdings remain unresolved, chiefly for lack of the data needed to analyze them.
- 2025-12-10The House passes the Fiscal Year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, which for the fifth straight year carries UAP provisions: expanded disclosure of military UAP intercepts to Congress, centralization of data under AARO, and an accounting of the classification rules governing UAP records.
- 2026-03-31The House Oversight Committee's declassification task force, chaired by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, writes to the Secretary of War requesting 46 UAP video files that whistleblowers say AARO holds. The department misses her mid-April deadline, feeding the perception of continued withholding.
- 2026-05-08The Department of War launches the PURSUE portal at war.gov/UFO, publishing an initial 162 files covering more than 400 UAP incidents from 1947 to 2026. Further tranches follow through the spring, including video and audio, in what officials describe as the largest coordinated UAP release in US history.
From the case file
The actual records: declassified, released, or leaked. We link straight to each document in its official archive, so you never have to take our word for it. Read the originals yourself.
Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters (PURSUE) release portal
The public portal for the 2026 disclosure wave, hosting hundreds of declassified UAP files, videos, and audio from multiple agencies. It is the primary artifact of the release the theory reads as a managed cover-up, and the record itself is open for anyone to examine.
Read the document: U.S. Department of War (war.gov/UFO) →Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with UAP, Volume I
AARO's book-length review of US UAP efforts from 1945 to 2023. It found no verifiable evidence that any sighting was extraterrestrial technology and no evidence of a recovered or reverse-engineered craft, directly addressing the crash-retrieval claim.
Read the document: U.S. Department of Defense →Fiscal Year 2024 Consolidated Annual Report on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
AARO's annual report to Congress logging 757 new UAP reports. It resolves cases with sufficient data to prosaic objects and states that the majority of holdings remain unresolved for lack of data, the finding the theory reinterprets as evidence of the exotic.
Read the document: U.S. Department of Defense →Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
The 2021 intelligence-community assessment that examined 144 UAP reports and explained only one, leaving the rest unresolved for lack of data while explicitly declining to conclude any were extraterrestrial. An early anchor for the modern debate.
Read the document: Office of the Director of National Intelligence →House Oversight Task Force UAP Video Request Letter to the Secretary of War
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna's task force letter requesting 46 UAP video files that whistleblowers said AARO holds. The department missed the deadline to produce them, the documented withholding the theory cites as ongoing concealment.
Read the document: U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform →Other case files that cite the same sources
The disclosure is real: the Department of War is releasing historical UAP files through the PURSUE portal, AARO exists and reports that a large share of its cases stay unresolved, and whistleblowers have testified to Congress about a crash-retrieval program. But the claim we rate, that non-human craft are confirmed and being hidden, is not established. AARO's own 2024 Historical Record Report found no verifiable evidence of extraterrestrial technology or any reverse-engineering program, and unexplained is not the same as extraterrestrial. No verifiable physical proof of a non-human craft has been produced.
Reviewed by Colin Peterson · Last reviewed August 7, 2026 · How we rate
Common questions
Is UAP disclosure (2026) true?
The disclosure is real: the Department of War is releasing historical UAP files through the PURSUE portal, AARO exists and reports that a large share of its cases stay unresolved, and whistleblowers have testified to Congress about a crash-retrieval program. But the claim we rate, that non-human craft are confirmed and being hidden, is not established. AARO's own 2024 Historical Record Report found no verifiable evidence of extraterrestrial technology or any reverse-engineering program, and unexplained is not the same as extraterrestrial. No verifiable physical proof of a non-human craft has been produced.
What is UAP disclosure (2026)?
In 2026 the US government began, for the first time, to release a large body of historical UAP records to the public through a dedicated portal (war.gov/UFO), the Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters, or PURSUE. The Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) reports that most of its case holdings rem…
What does the evidence show?
There is a genuine oddity in the release worth putting on the record, and it is not the one the claim reaches for. The War Zone, reviewing the PURSUE archive on the day it opened, reported that some of the records, including material from the FBI and NASA, had already been released at least in part in the past. Re-publishing documents th…
Why do people believe it?
The baseline is real, which makes the leap feel small. Unlike theories that start from nothing, this one starts from admitted facts: a genuine secret study program, a real office, a real backlog of unexplained cases, and a real mass declassification. When that much is conceded, believing there is one more secret feels like a short step r…
What is still unresolved?
Why do so many cases stay unresolved, and could better sensors change the ratio? AARO attributes the backlog to insufficient data rather than exotic origin, but the office itself flags a small number of cases as genuinely anomalous and meriting further study. Whether improved, purpose-built collection would resolve those to prosaic cause…
Sources
- 1.The Newly Released Government UFO Archives Will Leave You Shrugging, The War Zone (2026)
- 2.Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), Volume I, All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, U.S. Department of Defense (2024)
- 3.Vance says he's 'skeptical' about UFOs and 'aliens' in US custody on Joe Rogan's podcast, NewsNation (2026)
- 4.Fiscal Year 2024 Consolidated Annual Report on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, U.S. Department of Defense (2024)
- 5.Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters (PURSUE) release portal, U.S. Department of War (2026)
- 6.Department of War Publishes Second Release of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Files on WAR.GOV/UFO, U.S. Department of War (2026)
- 7.Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, Office of the Director of National Intelligence (2021)
- 8.Opening Statement of David Grusch, House Oversight Subcommittee Hearing on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability (2023)
- 9.Luna Continues Transparency Investigation into UAPs, U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (2026)
- 10.S.2296 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026, 119th Congress, U.S. Congress (Congress.gov, Library of Congress) (2025)
- 11.Whistleblower testifies U.S. salvaged 'non-human biologics' from UFO crash sites, NPR (2023)
Embed this case file on your site
Paste this snippet to show this case file as a small card, with a link back to the full write-up. Free to use.
<iframe src="https://theconspiratory.com/embed/uap-disclosure-2026" title="The Conspiratory verdict" width="520" height="190" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>Help us investigate
This is a living case file. If you spot an error or know evidence we missed, tell us, and weigh in on where you land.
Where do you land?
Cast your read on this one.
Comments
Add your take. Comments are read and approved by a human before they appear, so keep it on topic and civil. Please do not accuse named, living people of crimes.