The Nayirah incubator testimony that helped sell the Gulf War was a PR-manufactured atrocity story
Where the evidence lands: ContradictedThat the emotional centerpiece of the case for the 1991 Gulf War, a 15-year-old witness named 'Nayirah' who told Congress she saw Iraqi soldiers remove Kuwaiti babies from incubators and leave them to die, was a staged and coached performance: the witness was the concealed daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the US, the testimony was organized by the PR firm Hill & Knowlton for the Kuwaiti-funded group Citizens for a Free Kuwait, and the incubator atrocity as described was never substantiated by independent investigators.
Believed by: Widely accepted by the American public and cited by seven senators and President George H. W. Bush during the January 1991 war debate; now catalogued by journalists and historians as a textbook case of wartime propaganda
The full story
The performance
On 10 October 1990, ten weeks after Iraqi tanks rolled into Kuwait, a 15-year-old girl sat before the Congressional Human Rights Caucus and told a story that would travel around the world. Identified only as “Nayirah,”said to be a hospital volunteer whose full name was being withheld to protect her family back in occupied Kuwait, she described what she said she had witnessed with her own eyes: “I saw the Iraqi soldiers come into the hospital with guns. They took the babies out of the incubators, took the incubators, and left the children to die on the cold floor.” She wept as she spoke.
It was devastating, and it was meant to be. The caucus, co-chaired by Representatives Tom Lantos and John Porter, was not a committee of Congress with subpoena power, and its witnesses were not placed under oath, a detail that mattered more than anyone watching could have known. What looked like sworn testimony in a chamber of the Capitol was closer to a carefully arranged press event. The image, a trembling girl describing murdered newborns, did precisely what such an image is built to do: it made the argument feel already settled.
The machinery behind the tears
The setting was not accidental, and neither was the witness. Weeks earlier, the Kuwaiti government-in-exile had funded a group called Citizens for a Free Kuwait, a front whose money came overwhelmingly from the Kuwaiti state itself, and which in turn hired the public relations giant Hill & Knowlton. The firm was then led by Craig Fuller, who had been chief of staff to George H. W. Bush during Bush's vice presidency, a connection that put the campaign for war unusually close to the man who would decide it.
Hill & Knowlton did what a top firm does: it built a campaign. It helped arrange the caucus appearance, and its vice president Lauri Fitz-Pegadoworked with Nayirah on how the testimony would be delivered. The Human Rights Caucus, for its part, rented office space inside Hill & Knowlton's Washington headquarters, a coziness between the lobbyists and the forum that would later draw sharp questions. When the girl sat down to testify, a professional communications operation had shaped nearly everything about the moment except the audience's belief that it was watching something spontaneous.
What looked like a raw eyewitness account was a professionally staged event, arranged by a firm working for the government that stood to gain from it.
How far it traveled
The story did not stay in a caucus room. President Bush seized on it, repeating the incubator account on multiple occasions in the weeks that followed and citing a figure of 312 infants said to have died. That number carried an air of precision and of independent confirmation, because in December 1990 Amnesty International had published a report repeating a version of the claim. To a public and a Congress trying to judge whether to go to war, it looked as though a respected human rights organization had checked the story and found it true.
The account reached the Senate floor. Seven senators invoked it in speeches supporting military action. On 12 January 1991, the Senate voted 52 to 47to authorize the use of force against Iraq, among the narrowest war authorizations in American history. No one can prove that the incubator story flipped a specific vote, and it would be dishonest to claim otherwise. But a manufactured atrocity that made it into the president's remarks and the floor debate, during a vote decided by a handful of senators, was not a minor prop. It was one of the most repeated emotional arguments in the entire case for war.
The unraveling
The exposure came from journalism, and mostly after the fighting was over. In January 1992, John R. MacArthur, publisher of Harper's Magazine, revealed in The New York Timeswhat had been hidden: “Nayirah” was Nayirah al-Sabah, the daughter of Saud Nasir al-Sabah, Kuwait's ambassador to the United States. The anonymous hospital volunteer was a member of the ruling family whose government had paid for the campaign in which she appeared. MacArthur expanded the account in his book Second Front: Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War.
The substance fell apart alongside the staging. ABC News correspondent John Martin and the group Middle East Watch investigated in liberated Kuwait and found no reliable basis for the incubator killings as described; doctors and hospital staff who were there did not corroborate the account of soldiers systematically pulling infants from incubators. Most tellingly, Amnesty Internationalretracted its earlier report, stating it had found no reliable evidence that Iraqi forces caused the babies' deaths by removing them from incubators. The one apparently independent confirmation had dissolved. Amnesty's leadership went further, accusing the administration of opportunistic use of the human rights cause.
The star witness was the ambassador's daughter; the independent confirmation was later withdrawn. What remained was a coached story that did not survive investigation.
What is debunked, and what is not
Precision matters here, because this story is easy to stretch in both directions. What is debunkedis specific and well supported: the incubator atrocity as told to Congress was never substantiated, and the testimony that delivered it was a deception, from the concealed identity of the witness to the professional coaching behind her tears. That is not a theory. It is documented in MacArthur's reporting, in the postwar investigations, and in Amnesty International's own retraction.
What is not debunked is the war itself, or the fact of Iraqi wrongdoing. Iraq really did invade and occupy Kuwait in August 1990; real abuses were documented during the occupation; and in the chaos as medical staff fled, some patients, including premature infants, did die. None of that depends on the incubator story, and pointing out that the story was staged does not erase any of it. The honest conclusion is narrow and it is enough: one of the most powerful emotional arguments used to sell a war was manufactured by a public relations firm, presented under a false guise, and later found to be unsupported. A real war can be argued on real grounds. This particular selling point was not one of them.
What's still unexplained
- How much the incubator story actually moved votes and public opinion cannot be measured precisely. It was cited by the president and by senators, and the war vote was extremely close, but war support was rising for many reasons; the counterfactual, whether the Senate still authorizes force without the story, is unknowable.
- The exact chain of coaching is documented only in part. That Hill & Knowlton arranged the appearance and that Lauri Fitz-Pegado worked with Nayirah is established; how much of the specific incubator language was hers, was suggested, or was embellished in the retelling is harder to pin down at this distance.
- Whether isolated incubator-related deaths occurred in the chaos of the occupation, distinct from the staged mass-atrocity claim, is a separate and murkier question. Investigators found no basis for the systematic killings described, but the fog of an invasion leaves some individual cases impossible to fully reconstruct.
Point by point
The claim: 'Nayirah' was an ordinary Kuwaiti eyewitness who happened to have seen a hospital atrocity.
What the record shows: She was Nayirah al-Sabah, the daughter of Saud Nasir al-Sabah, Kuwait's ambassador to the United States, a fact withheld from the caucus and the public at the time. The stated reason for anonymity was to protect family still in occupied Kuwait, but the effect was to hide that the star witness to Iraqi barbarity was a member of the ruling family whose government was paying for the campaign she was appearing in. John R. MacArthur's 1992 reporting established the identity that had been concealed.
The claim: The testimony was a spontaneous act of witness, not a piece of public relations.
What the record shows: It was organized and prepared by Hill & Knowlton on behalf of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, a group funded overwhelmingly by the Kuwaiti government. The firm, then headed by former Bush vice-presidential chief of staff Craig Fuller, helped arrange the caucus appearance; its vice president Lauri Fitz-Pegado worked with Nayirah on her delivery. The Human Rights Caucus itself rented office space in Hill & Knowlton's Washington headquarters. This was a professionally staged event presented as a raw eyewitness account.
The claim: The incubator killings were independently confirmed by Amnesty International.
What the record shows: Amnesty's December 1990 report did repeat a version of the claim, and President Bush cited it. But after the war Amnesty retracted, stating it had found no reliable evidence that Iraqi forces caused the deaths of babies by removing them from incubators. The retraction of the one seemingly independent corroboration is central: what looked like confirmation turned out to rest on the same unverified accounts, not on separate investigation.
The claim: Postwar investigation confirmed that Iraqi soldiers dumped hundreds of babies from incubators.
What the record shows: It did the opposite. ABC News correspondent John Martin and the group Middle East Watch investigated in Kuwait after liberation and found no basis for the atrocity as told. Kuwaiti doctors and hospital staff interviewed afterward did not support the account of soldiers systematically pulling infants from incubators. Investigators concluded that while hospitals were looted and patients died amid the chaos of invasion and the flight of medical staff, the specific, deliberate incubator killings described to Congress almost certainly did not occur.
The claim: No babies died at all, so the whole occupation narrative was invented.
What the record shows: This overreaches in the other direction, and the honest account resists it. Kuwait was genuinely invaded and occupied; real abuses were documented; and some patients, including premature infants, did die in the disorder as staff fled and supplies failed. What is debunked is the particular, coached, made-for-television claim of soldiers tearing hundreds of babies from incubators and leaving them on the floor, not the fact of the war or of Iraqi wrongdoing. Precision cuts both ways here.
The claim: Even if staged, the testimony was a minor footnote that did not affect the decision for war.
What the record shows: The claim was prominent in the public case for military action. Bush repeated the incubator story on multiple occasions, including the figure of 312 infants; seven senators cited it in speeches supporting the use of force; and the Senate authorized war by only 52 to 47. It is impossible to prove any single vote turned on the story, but a manufactured atrocity that reached the president's speeches and the Senate floor during the closest of war votes is not a footnote.
Timeline
- 1990-08-02Iraq invades and occupies Kuwait. The invasion and the occupation that follows are real, documented, and not in dispute; they are the backdrop against which the incubator story is later deployed, not the thing this file questions.
- 1990-08The Kuwaiti government-in-exile funds Citizens for a Free Kuwait, a front group that hires the public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, then led by Craig Fuller, a former chief of staff to Vice President George H. W. Bush, to build American support for military action. The great bulk of the group's funding comes from the Kuwaiti government itself.
- 1990-10-10Before the Congressional Human Rights Caucus, co-chaired by Representatives Tom Lantos and John Porter, a 15-year-old identified only as 'Nayirah' tearfully testifies that she watched Iraqi soldiers take babies out of incubators at a Kuwait City hospital and leave them 'to die on the cold floor.' The caucus is not a committee with subpoena power, and witnesses are not placed under oath.
- 1990-12-19Amnesty International publishes an 84-page report on abuses in occupied Kuwait that includes a claim, drawn from unverified accounts, that hundreds of premature babies died after being removed from incubators. The figure lends the incubator story an appearance of independent confirmation it did not have.
- 1991-01President Bush invokes the incubator story repeatedly, citing a figure of 312 infants, in the run-up to the congressional vote. In floor speeches, seven senators reference the account. On January 12, the Senate authorizes the use of force by 52 to 47, one of the closest war votes in modern American history.
- 1992-01Journalist John R. MacArthur reveals that 'Nayirah' was Nayirah al-Sabah, daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the United States, Saud Nasir al-Sabah, and that Hill & Knowlton had arranged and prepared her appearance. His reporting appears in The New York Times and is expanded in his book Second Front.
- 1991-1992ABC News correspondent John Martin, the group Middle East Watch, and other investigators find no reliable evidence for the incubator killings as described. Amnesty International retracts its earlier account, stating it found no reliable evidence Iraqi forces caused the babies' deaths by removing them from incubators.
From the case file
The actual records: declassified, released, or leaked. We link straight to each document in its official archive, so you never have to take our word for it. Read the originals yourself.
Contradicted. The specific atrocity claim was never substantiated, and the way it was delivered was a deception. On October 10, 1990, a 15-year-old identified only as 'Nayirah' told a congressional caucus she had watched Iraqi soldiers pull Kuwaiti babies from hospital incubators and leave them to die on the floor. She was in fact Nayirah al-Sabah, the daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the United States, an identity concealed at the time; her appearance was arranged and her delivery prepared by the PR firm Hill & Knowlton, working for the Kuwaiti-funded front group Citizens for a Free Kuwait. After the war, ABC News, Middle East Watch, and Amnesty International (which retracted its own earlier report) found no reliable evidence the incubator killings happened as described. Rated debunked as a manufactured claim. This narrow finding is separate from the broader, real fact of Iraq's 1990 invasion and occupation of Kuwait, which is not in dispute.
Reviewed by The Conspiratory Editors · Last reviewed July 18, 2026 · How we rate
Sources
- 1.When contemplating war, beware of babies in incubators, Tom Regan, The Christian Science Monitor (2002)
- 2.A Debate on One of the Most Frequently Cited Justifications for the 1991 Persian Gulf War: Did PR Firm Hill & Knowlton Invent the Story of Iraqi Soldiers Pulling Kuwaiti Babies From Incubators?, Democracy Now! (2003)
- 3.How False Testimony and a Massive U.S. Propaganda Machine Bolstered George H.W. Bush's War on Iraq, Democracy Now! (2018)
- 4.The News Industry, John R. MacArthur, Middle East Report (MERIP) (1992)
- 5.Witness for Kuwait, John R. MacArthur, The Baltimore Sun (1992)
- 6.How PR Sold the War in the Persian Gulf, John Stauber & Sheldon Rampton, Toxic Sludge Is Good For You (Center for Media and Democracy / PR Watch) (1995)
- 7.U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote on S.J.Res. 2, Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq, January 12, 1991, United States Senate (1991)
- 8.Human Rights and Wrongs, Alexander Cockburn, London Review of Books (1991)
- 9.Persian Gulf War, Encyclopaedia Britannica
Help us investigate
This is a living case file. If you spot an error or know evidence we missed, tell us, and weigh in on where you land.
Where do you land?
Cast your read on this one.
Comments
Add your take. Comments are read and approved by a human before they appear, so keep it on topic and civil. Please do not accuse named, living people of crimes.