A hidden planet called Nibiru is on a collision course with Earth
By Colin PetersonJuly 8, 2026
Where the evidence lands: Contradicted
That a large, hidden planet (called Nibiru or Planet X) is on a collision or close-approach course with Earth, and that governments know about it and are concealing it from the public to prevent panic.
Contradicted. No such object exists. A planet on a path to hit or pass close to Earth would already be visible to backyard telescopes and would already be dragging on the orbits of the Moon and inner planets, and it isn't.
Believed by: A recurring internet doomsday belief, revived with a new date every few years
The full story
A warning from an implant
The modern Nibiru story does not come from an astronomer, an ancient text, or a government leak. It comes from one person: Nancy Lieder, a Wisconsin woman who, in 1995, launched a website called ZetaTalk and said she had been fitted as a child with a communications device, implanted in her brain by an alien species she called the Zetas. She said the Zetas had chosen her to warn humanity that a hidden planet was headed toward Earth, and that she was relaying their messages directly.
Two years later, with public attention fixed on the real and spectacular Comet Hale–Bopp, Lieder folded her claim into the moment, asserting that a companion planet was trailing behind it, invisible to ordinary observation. Astronomers who had been tracking Hale–Bopp in detail found nothing of the kind, but the association stuck in the corners of the early internet where the idea was taking hold.
The claim then acquired a name with real historical weight: Nibiru, borrowed from Babylonian astronomical texts, where it referred to a marker point in the sky connected to the god Marduk, most commonly understood by historians of the ancient Near East as a name for Jupiter at a specific position, not a rogue planet threatening the Earth. The borrowed name gave a brand-new claim the surface texture of something ancient and rediscovered, rather than something invented the previous decade.
A date that came and went, and came again
Lieder's specific prediction was concrete enough to be tested: the planet, she said, would sweep through the inner solar system in May 2003, setting off a catastrophic shift in Earth's rotational poles that would kill the majority of the human population. The date arrived. Nothing happened.
Rather than treat the non-event as a disproof, Lieder reframed it: the 2003 date, she now said, had been a deliberate “White Lie,” issued by the Zetas to keep world governments from learning the real date and declaring martial law in response. This move (recasting a failed, falsifiable prediction as evidence of a still-hidden truth) is the mechanism that has kept the claim alive for three decades. It reappears almost every time a new predicted date fails.
The story found its largest audience once it merged with an unrelated and much larger internet phenomenon: the idea that the Mayan Long Count calendar predicted the end of the world on December 21, 2012. Nibiru proponents adopted 2012 as their new target date, and for a period the two claims became almost inseparable in the public imagination, generating enough public concern that NASA fielded sustained questions from worried readers in the years leading up to it.
December 21, 2012 passed without incident, exactly as it had in 2003. The pattern repeated again in 2017, when a self-described “Christian numerologist,” David Meade, revived the claim with a new date (September 23, 2017), derived from a mix of biblical numerology and pyramid geometry. When that date passed, he pushed it back twice more. New dates, detached from any of the previous ones, have continued to surface online on an irregular cycle since.
Real secrets, a real book, and a real telescope
The most charitable version of the Nibiru claim does not rest on the specifics of Nancy Lieder's biography: it rests on a more general and genuinely reasonable instinct: governments and scientific institutions have, historically, sat on information, delayed disclosures, and sometimes misled the public about matters ranging from nuclear testing to surveillance programs. Anyone who has followed those histories has a legitimate reason to wonder what else might be withheld, and large, unexplained objects in the sky are an old and recurring subject of public curiosity precisely because the sky is somewhere ordinary people can look for themselves.
The name itself has a real, traceable history that predates Lieder by two decades. In 1976, a New York writer named Zecharia Sitchin (trained in economic history at the University of London, and a former journalist and shipping-company executive who taught himself to read Akkadian and Sumerian cuneiform) published The 12th Planet, the first of a seven-book series arguing that Mesopotamian tablets already described a giant planet on a roughly 3,600-year elliptical orbit, home to an advanced people he called the Anunnaki. In Sitchin's reading, Sumerian astronomers already counted eleven bodies in the solar system (the Sun, the Moon, and nine planets including Pluto), which made this hidden world the twelfth, and gave his book its title. Whatever one makes of his translations, Sitchin was working from real cuneiform texts and a genuine ancient civilization's astronomy, not inventing his source material from nothing, and his books have sold millions of copies and remain in print worldwide. For believers, a full ancient civilization apparently describing a hidden planet, decades before any modern channeler said a word about it, reads less like coincidence and more like corroboration.
Believers can also point to a moment when the astronomical establishment itself seemed to say almost exactly this, on the record, on a newspaper's front page. On December 30, 1983, The Washington Post ran a story by reporter Thomas O'Toole under the headline “Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered,” reporting that NASA's new infrared satellite, IRAS, had detected an unidentified object in the direction of Orion, according to early estimates, possibly as large as Jupiter and closer to Earth than any known body beyond Pluto. The IRAS team's own chief scientist, Gerry Neugebauer, of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, told the Post on the record, “All I can tell you is that we don't know what it is.” For a claim that rests on official uncertainty being quietly resolved behind closed doors, a real NASA-affiliated scientist publicly admitting, in a national newspaper, that he had no explanation for an object that size is about as close as the record gets to confirmation in the believers' own terms.
There is a genuine scientific pedigree behind the idea, too: the term “Planet X” is not a phrase invented by internet doomsday writers. Early twentieth-century astronomer Percival Lowell used it in 1915 to describe a hypothesized planet he thought was needed to explain apparent irregularities in Uranus's orbit, irregularities that were later traced to measurement error, not a real planet, but the search for an undiscovered outer planet has a long and legitimate pedigree in professional astronomy. And as recently as 2016, credentialed astronomers at a major research university proposed (in a peer-reviewed journal, not a blog) that an undiscovered planet might exist far beyond Neptune. If mainstream science can take the idea of a hidden planet seriously, the believers argue, dismissing every version of the claim out of hand looks less like scientific caution and more like reflexive denial.
Why the dates keep landing near an eclipse
David Meade did not pick 23 September 2017 out of the air, and how he did pick it is worth following, because it is the mechanism rather than the man.
He chose it as 33 days after the total solar eclipse that crossed the United States on 21 August 2017, offering as his reasoning that Jesus lived 33 years and that the name Elohim appears 33 times in scripture. The eclipse was the anchor. The prophecy was an offset from it.
Once you see that structure it turns up everywhere in dated-doomsday material, and it is an efficient piece of design. An eclipse is published years ahead in tables anyone can look up, so the anchor date is already known, already searched for, and already surrounded by coverage. It is genuinely spectacular, which supplies the feeling that something significant is happening. And because the claim attaches to an offset rather than to the eclipse itself, the eclipse never tests it: the Moon does exactly what the tables said, the offset date arrives and passes, and the method walks away intact to be used on the next one.
The same thing is happening as this file is updated. Three unrelated invented catastrophes have fastened onto 12 August 2026: a seven-second loss of gravity, a two-minute worldwide blackout, and a reading of the day as biblical end-times. None has anything to do with the others. What they share is a host, a real and entirely ordinary total eclipse over Greenland, Iceland and northern Spain, which had a date going spare.
There is a tell buried in this, and it is the reason the section sits in the file at all. A planet genuinely on a collision course would arrive when its orbit brought it, and that date would come from the object. A claim whose dates have to be borrowed from an eclipse table is telling you, without meaning to, where its dates actually come from.
Why the sky would already show it
The believers' strongest point is really an argument for taking the search for undiscovered planets seriously, and professional astronomy does take it seriously. The problem for the Nibiru claim specifically is that it describes something categorically different from a cautious scientific hypothesis: an object large enough and close enough to devastate Earth, arriving on a timescale of months to years. That kind of object cannot hide.
The ancient pedigree is thinner than it looks. The name is real, and Sitchin did work from genuine Akkadian and Sumerian tablets, but the professional Assyriologists and Sumerologists who have spent careers reading those languages have examined his translations directly and rejected them as unsupported by the texts themselves. Mainstream scholarship reads the term Sitchin built his book around as an astronomical marker point tied to the god Marduk, generally understood as a name for Jupiter at a specific position in the sky, not a physical world with an orbit of its own. And Sitchin himself never claimed what the doomsday version needs. Before his death in 2010, he explicitly denied any connection between his work and Nancy Lieder's collision predictions, and his own math ran nothing like an emergency: his 2007 book placed Nibiru's last passage around 556 BC and its next one nearly a millennium away, with, at the very earliest, a possible Anunnaki return by spacecraft sometime after 2090. Even taken entirely on its own terms, the source Lieder borrowed her planet's name from never predicted an imminent catastrophe at all.
The 1983 telescope story resolves just as publicly as it began. IRAS really had detected several genuinely unidentified sources, and Dr. Neugebauer's uncertainty was real, but the same Post interview also quoted him rejecting the reading that later took hold online. Asked about the chance the object was approaching Earth, he said, “It's not incoming mail. I want to douse that idea with as much cold water as I can.” The article itself noted why: IRAS had observed the object twice, six months apart, with no measurable movement: the signature of something very distant, not something inbound. The following year, a formal analysis in The Astrophysical Journal identified the unidentified sources directly: nine were distant, infrared-bright galaxies, and the tenth was “infrared cirrus”: faint interstellar dust drifting within our own galaxy. None were planets. Retellings of this story that still circulate today consistently leave out both the scientist's own denial and the resolution that followed it.
NASA has addressed the claim directly and repeatedly, rather than ignoring it. David Morrison, a senior NASA scientist who has fielded thousands of public questions about Nibiru over the years, has explained the core physical problem: an object large enough to threaten Earth, following an orbit that brought it anywhere near the inner solar system, would be bright enough to see with the naked eye and would have been photographed and tracked by professional and amateur astronomers alike long before any close approach. Backyard telescopes routinely image Pluto, a small, dim, distant world; a genuinely dangerous planet-sized body would be far easier to spot, not harder.
The search has, in fact, already been done at a much larger scale than any backyard telescope. NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) scanned the entire sky in infrared light, a wavelength well suited to finding cold, dark objects that reflect little visible light. It found no object the size of Saturn or larger within 10,000 astronomical units of the Sun, and nothing larger than Jupiter within 26,000 astronomical units: distances far beyond anything consistent with a planet now approaching Earth. As Kevin Luhman of Penn State's Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds put it, summarizing the survey's findings, the outer solar system “probably does not contain a large gas giant planet, or a small, companion star.”
There is a second, independent line of evidence, and it does not require finding the object at all: its absence would be visible in the effects it should be having. A planet massive enough to threaten Earth would exert a gravitational pull strong enough to measurably disturb the orbits of the Moon and the inner planets, orbits that are tracked with extraordinary precision through spacecraft navigation and radar ranging. No such disturbance has been detected. A collision-course planet cannot be simultaneously invisible to every telescope on Earth and undetectable in its own gravitational footprint; those are two separate, independent tests, and the claim fails both.
One distinction has to be drawn plainly, because the two are often blurred. “Planet Nine” is a real, still-unresolved hypothesis in professional astronomy, proposed by Caltech astronomers Konstantin Batygin and Michael Brown in a peer-reviewed 2016 paper in The Astronomical Journal. Their evidence is not a claim of visual sighting or alien contact: it is a statistical pattern in the clustered orbits of several small, distant Kuiper Belt objects, which they argue is best explained by the gravitational influence of an unseen planet. Crucially, their own estimate places any such planet, if it is real, at hundreds of times Earth's distance from the Sun, and their paper states outright that it would have “no chance … of ever colliding with Earth, or bringing ‘days of darkness.’” Planet Nine, if it exists at all, is a slow-moving scientific question about the outer solar system's structure. It is not evidence for Nibiru, and the two should not be cited interchangeably.
A story built to survive its own failure
What makes Nibiru unusual among conspiracy claims is not its content but its structure: it is a prediction that has already failed, publicly and repeatedly, and yet each failure has been absorbed into the story rather than ending it. A missed date becomes a “White Lie,” a delay, or evidence that the original date was never the real one. That reframing lets the belief persist indefinitely, because no single failed prediction is ever allowed to count as a final test.
The claim also draws strength from borrowed legitimacy on two fronts. It uses a real name from Babylonian astronomy, which lets a recent invention feel like ancient, rediscovered wisdom. And it sits close enough to a genuine open question in astronomy (whether an undiscovered planet exists far beyond Neptune) that believers can point to real scientists taking “a hidden planet” seriously, even though the planet those scientists are discussing bears no resemblance to the one described in the doomsday version.
Underneath both mechanisms is something more ordinary: a single, legible cause for an unmanageable array of anxieties. Earthquakes, extreme weather, and a general sense that the world feels unstable are easier to hold if they can be traced to one concrete, physical thing, rather than to the diffuse and harder-to-picture mechanisms (plate tectonics, a warming climate, ordinary geopolitical friction) that actually produce them. And like many end-times narratives, it offers the believer a form of status: the comfort of being among the few who supposedly know what the rest of the world is being kept from.
Who a doomsday date actually reaches
There is a temptation to treat all this as harmless internet weather, a recurring silly season that costs nobody anything. The person best placed to judge that spent years answering the mail, and reached the opposite conclusion.
David Morrison, a senior scientist at the NASA Astrobiology Institute, became the agency's de facto public answerer on Nibiru and the 2012 claims, fielding questions from the public in the years around the predicted date. Speaking publicly about that correspondence, he said he was receiving letters at a rate of one or two a month from people who identified themselves as eleven or twelve years old and who wrote that they were considering ending their lives because of what they had read online. He also described inquiries from adults asking about the same thing in relation to themselves and their children. “It happens often enough to disturb me,” he said, “to hear that children are considering ending their lives.”
His response was blunt about where responsibility sat: he called it evil to spread rumors online that frighten children, and he ended up recording videos aimed specifically at reassuring young people who had come across the material and believed it. A NASA planetary scientist making explainer videos for frightened eleven-year-olds is not a normal use of anybody's expertise, and it is worth sitting with why it became necessary.
This is the reason this file states its conclusion flatly instead of winking at it. An adult who encounters a dated catastrophe claim usually has the context to place it, and can enjoy it as a curiosity. A child searching the same words at eleven does not, and will find a great deal of confident material asserting a specific date on which they and everyone they know will die. Between those two audiences, the second is the one a plain answer is for.
The point generalizes past Nibiru, which is why it sits here rather than in a footnote. The mechanics described earlier, a fixed date, an invented agency programme, a leaked document nobody can produce, are running again right now around 12 August 2026, attached to a real and entirely ordinary solar eclipse. The names change and the structure does not, and neither does the audience that takes it literally.
The bottom line
The claim is Contradicted. No telescope, professional or amateur, has ever recorded the object; a planet-sized body on a path anywhere near Earth would already be visible and would already be measurably disturbing the orbits of the Moon and inner planets, and neither effect is observed. The claim traces to a single named individual, not a scientific finding, and every specific date attached to it (2003, 2012, 2017, and the several revisions since) has passed without incident.
None of this touches the separate, legitimate scientific question of whether an undiscovered planet exists in the far outer solar system. That hypothesis, known as Planet Nine, is real, unresolved, and worth watching, but it describes a small, distant world with, in its own proposers' words, no chance of ever reaching Earth. Confusing the two does a disservice to both: it lends false credibility to a doomsday claim that has already failed every test put to it, and it risks making a legitimate scientific search sound like something it isn't.
Watch
What's still unexplained
- Whether a real, distant ninth planet exists in the outer solar system is a genuinely open question in professional astronomy, separate from anything Nibiru proponents claim. The clustering pattern Konstantin Batygin and Michael Brown identified in 2016 has never been confirmed by directly observing a planet, and specialists are still divided on how much weight it can bear.
- The question may not stay open much longer. The Vera C. Rubin Observatory's new sky survey is expected to have a good chance of detecting Planet Nine within the next few years if it exists where current models place it, and recent discoveries are already reshaping the search: a stable, distant object nicknamed 'Ammonite' (2023 KQ14), announced in July 2025, doesn't fit the orbital pattern that first suggested Planet Nine, leading some astronomers to argue any real planet would have to sit much farther out than proposed, and others to see it as a challenge to the hypothesis itself.
- How far this material actually reaches children, and whether anything platforms have tried reduces that reach, is not well measured. The account that exists is anecdotal by nature, one scientist describing the mail he received, and no systematic study has followed up on it in the years since. That is a gap in what is known, not a reason to discount his account.
- None of this bears on the Nibiru doomsday claim. Batygin and Brown's own paper places any real Planet Nine hundreds of times farther from the Sun than Earth, on a slow, stable orbit that poses, in their words, no chance of colliding with anything. A live scientific debate over a distant, harmless planet is not evidence for, and should not be confused with, a repeatedly failed prediction of imminent planetary collision.
Point by point
The claim: The 2017 prediction was anchored to real astronomy, the Great American Eclipse, so it was not arbitrary numerology.
What the record shows: The eclipse was real; the link to it was not astronomical. David Meade set his date at 23 September 2017 because it fell 33 days after the 21 August eclipse, reasoning that Jesus lived 33 years and that Elohim appears 33 times in scripture. Nothing in that connects an eclipse to an approaching planet. It connects a publicised date to a number the predictor found meaningful, which is a method that will produce a date from any eclipse in the catalogue and has. When 23 September passed, the date moved twice more, and the eclipse itself was never in question at any point, because it was never what the claim was actually resting on.
The claim: Astronomers keep saying it is not there, but they would say that; only a government could confirm an object like this.
What the record shows: Confirmation would not be a government's to give. The sky is watched continuously by tens of thousands of amateurs in every country, using equipment that would show a body on a near-Earth approach as an obvious moving object months out, and the observing community has no shared employer, no shared government and every professional incentive to be the one who spots it. Concealment would require simultaneous silence from Chinese, Indian, Russian, European and American observatories plus the amateur networks, in a hobby whose entire culture is publishing what you saw last night. NASA has answered the question repeatedly and in plain terms since 2012, calling wayward-planet stories an internet hoax and noting that such an object would by now be visible to the naked eye.
The claim: A large planet is approaching Earth and will cause a catastrophic close encounter or collision.
What the record shows: No telescope, professional or amateur, has ever recorded such an object. NASA's WISE space telescope scanned the entire sky in infrared and found no object the size of Saturn or larger within 10,000 astronomical units, and nothing larger than Jupiter within 26,000: distances vastly greater than any incoming-planet scenario would require it to already occupy.
The claim: Governments are hiding the object from the public to prevent panic.
What the record shows: A planet large enough and close enough to threaten Earth would be trivially visible to the thousands of amateur astronomers, universities, and observatories worldwide who track the sky nightly and share data openly; keeping such a find secret across every country and every independent observer is not logistically plausible.
The claim: The idea revives a real ancient concept: Nibiru is a genuine name from Babylonian astronomy.
What the record shows: The name is real, but its modern meaning was invented. In Babylonian texts, 'Nibiru' was an astronomical marker point associated with the god Marduk, generally understood by historians as a name for Jupiter at a particular point in the sky, not a description of a rogue planet on a collision course with Earth.
The claim: A planet on an Earth-crossing orbit would explain unusual gravitational effects in the solar system.
What the record shows: The opposite is observed: the orbits of the Moon and the inner planets have been tracked with extreme precision for decades by spacecraft navigation and radar, and they show no unexplained deviations. A body massive enough to threaten Earth would have already been perturbing those orbits in measurable ways, and it hasn't.
The claim: This is the same 'Planet X' or 'Planet Nine' that real astronomers are searching for.
What the record shows: It is not. Astronomers Konstantin Batygin and Michael Brown proposed a real, hypothesized 'Planet Nine' in a 2016 peer-reviewed paper, based on the clustered orbits of small, distant Kuiper Belt objects, but their own paper places any such planet, if it exists, many hundreds of times farther from the Sun than Earth, with 'no chance of colliding with Earth.' It is a distinct, unresolved scientific question, not a confirmation of the doomsday claim.
Timeline
- 1995Nancy Lieder, a Wisconsin woman, launches the website ZetaTalk, saying she was fitted with a brain implant by extraterrestrials called 'Zetas' who chose her to warn humanity of an incoming planet.
- 1997Lieder ties her claim to public interest in the approaching Comet Hale–Bopp, asserting a hidden companion planet was trailing it, an assertion astronomers found no evidence for.
- 2003Lieder states the planet will sweep through the inner solar system in May 2003, triggering a catastrophic pole shift. The date passes uneventfully.
- 2003When nothing happens, Lieder calls the date a deliberate 'White Lie,' claiming the real date was withheld so that governments could not use it to impose martial law.
- 2000sThe Nibiru claim merges with an unrelated internet phenomenon: the idea that the Mayan Long Count calendar predicted the end of the world on December 21, 2012.
- 2012December 21 passes without any planetary encounter. NASA, which had spent months fielding public questions, publishes direct rebuttals before and after the date.
- 2017Christian numerologist David Meade revives the claim with a new date, September 23, 2017, tying it to biblical numerology; when it passes, he pushes the date back twice more.
- 2018–presentNibiru predictions continue to recur online on an irregular cycle, each new claimed date superseding the last one that failed.
From the case file
The actual records: declassified, released, or leaked. We link straight to each document in its official archive, so you never have to take our word for it. Read the originals yourself.
A Search for a Distant Companion to the Sun with the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer
The peer-reviewed WISE analysis behind the case's central finding: an all-sky infrared search that detected no Saturn-sized body out to roughly 28,000 astronomical units and no Jupiter-sized body out to roughly 82,000, far beyond any incoming-planet scenario. It is the scientific record, not proof of the doomsday claim it rules out.
Read the document: IOPscience (The Astrophysical Journal) →Unidentified Point Sources in the IRAS Minisurvey
The formal analysis of the unidentified infrared sources from the 1983 IRAS survey that fed the 'Mystery Heavenly Body' headlines. It identified the sources as distant galaxies and Galactic infrared cirrus, not a planet approaching Earth.
Read the document: NASA/SAO Astrophysics Data System →Contradicted. No such object exists. A planet on a path to hit or pass close to Earth would already be visible to backyard telescopes and would already be dragging on the orbits of the Moon and inner planets, and it isn't.
Reviewed by Colin Peterson · Last reviewed August 9, 2026 · How we rate
Common questions
Is Nibiru / Planet X true?
Contradicted. No such object exists. A planet on a path to hit or pass close to Earth would already be visible to backyard telescopes and would already be dragging on the orbits of the Moon and inner planets, and it isn't.
What is Nibiru / Planet X?
The claim that a hidden planet, 'Nibiru' or 'Planet X,' is speeding toward a collision with Earth: an idea that began with a single self-described alien contactee, borrowed a real ancient name, folded into the 2012 panic, and has resurfaced under new predicted dates ever since, each one passing without incident.
What does the evidence show?
The eclipse was real; the link to it was not astronomical. David Meade set his date at 23 September 2017 because it fell 33 days after the 21 August eclipse, reasoning that Jesus lived 33 years and that Elohim appears 33 times in scripture. Nothing in that connects an eclipse to an approaching planet. It connects a publicised date to a n…
Why do people believe it?
Every failed date is framed as a delay or a 'test,' not a disproof, which lets the underlying belief survive indefinitely by simply issuing a new date.
What is still unresolved?
Whether a real, distant ninth planet exists in the outer solar system is a genuinely open question in professional astronomy, separate from anything Nibiru proponents claim. The clustering pattern Konstantin Batygin and Michael Brown identified in 2016 has never been confirmed by directly observing a planet, and specialists are still div…
Sources
- 1.Why It's Unlikely the World Will End on September 23 (the 33-day offset from the 21 August 2017 eclipse and the numerology behind it), National Geographic (2017)
- 2.Rapture is coming on Sept. 23, conspiracy theorist claims, ABC7 Chicago (2017)
- 3.Why the World Didn't End Yesterday, NASA (2012)
- 4.The Truth about Nibiru, NASA Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute (SSERVI)
- 5.Scientists Reject Impending Nibiru-Earth Collision, NASA Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute (SSERVI)
- 6.NASA's WISE Survey Finds Thousands of New Stars, But No 'Planet X', NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (2014)
- 7.Hypothetical Planet X, NASA Science
- 8.Planet Nine, NASA Science
- 9.Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System, Konstantin Batygin & Michael E. Brown, The Astronomical Journal, Vol. 151, No. 2 (2016)
- 10.Zecharia Sitchin, Wikipedia
- 11.Possibly as Large as Jupiter; Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered, The Washington Post, Thomas O'Toole (1983)
- 12.Nibiru cataclysm, Wikipedia
- 13.2012 Mayan Apocalypse Rumors Have Dark Side, NASA Warns, NBC News (2012)
- 14.2012 Mayan Apocalypse Rumors Have Dark Side, NASA Warns, Space.com (2012)
- 15.Scared Of Planet Nibiru? NASA Would Like To Help, NPR (2009)
Embed this verdict on your site
Paste this snippet to show our sourced verdict as a small card, with a link back to the full case file. Free to use.
<iframe src="https://theconspiratory.com/embed/nibiru" title="The Conspiratory verdict" width="520" height="190" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>Help us investigate
This is a living case file. If you spot an error or know evidence we missed, tell us, and weigh in on where you land.
Where do you land?
Cast your read on this one.
Comments
Add your take. Comments are read and approved by a human before they appear, so keep it on topic and civil. Please do not accuse named, living people of crimes.